Republican-minded states might lose their place on totally legalizing hashish as voters in Arizona and South Dakota embrace leisure herbs
People from four other states may hear good news when the election results are in. These states could choose to legalize recreational marijuana through electoral processes.
Voters in the Democratic-dominant states of Montana and New Jersey and in the Republican-dominated states of Arizona and South Dakota will vote based on the suggestions for recreational marijuana.
Mississippi, another red state, is reviewing marijuana manifestos published by both political parties. Only two states of the eleven legalized adult marijuana users have made the necessary change in implementing the electoral initiative.
Polls show that Arizona, Montana, and New Jersey support electoral initiatives.
The executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, Steven Hawkins, sees it as a new breath of acceptance across the country for the controversial herb. The group focuses on many electoral initiatives.
Efforts to legalize marijuana through electoral initiative weren’t all sunshine and roses, but the pandemic fueled enough signatures for voting. “We couldn’t collect signatures or we would have seen six states,” said Hawkins.
“Election is one of the first-level procedures in marijuana legalization,” said John Hudak, assistant director of the Brookings Institution, which advocates federal marijuana policy.
If voters approve the proposal on November 3, state lawmakers would have to set up a regulatory structure in all approved states, Hudak said.
Marijuana Legalization in Arizona
Arizona’s proposal allows adults 21 and older to own, dispense, and move an ounce of herbs, and mandates the establishment of a regulatory system for the cultivation and sale of varieties of marijuana.
The last proposal from 2016 could not make it to the greener side and only failed by three points. But this time the surveys seem to be supported by a majority. The latest public opinion poll has 56% support for the proposal and 36% against among registered voters, publications Monmouth University survey, a university that conducts surveys.
Currently, Arizona is the only state that considers the smallest weed possession a criminal offense, a crime more serious than an offense, despite the fact that the state has legalized medicinal uses for over a decade.
Governor Doug Ducey, the party of the traditional elephant mascot, calls on voters to vote “no” and rejects the idea of the electoral action.
Ducey fears the wholesale expansion that legalization will bring. Additionally, “current medical legalization has paid health attention to people,” he adds in his article for and against the election argument.
Julie Gunnigle, the face of the Democratic Party, believes that if Arizona votes for legalization, it will have a huge cascading effect in other parts of the country.
“This is the anti-benchmark that Arizona is setting on recreational marijuana. If possible, the rest of the country should be prepared for it,” she added.
South Dakota could take a giant leap in humanity
South Dakota could be a giant leap compared to other states. Other states have embarked on multi-year paths of first decriminalizing them, authorizing medical use, and then seeking full legalization. Many states have been following the same algorithm for years.
But South Dakota stands ready to legalize both medical and adult use in one quick move – asking two voting questions at once. The Republican state could be the first to approve both varieties of marijuana at once.
Cannabis owners face severe penalties for holding onto small amounts of weeds.
Kristi Noem, who has subscribed to the Republican stance on the full legalization of marijuana, is opposed to both election measures and has asked voters not to vote for them.
In her anti-marijuana ad, she said, “I’ve never seen anyone smarter with the censer. There is no evidence that this improves our communities or has a negative impact on children. “
In response to the Republican rebuttal, Hudak believes “it would be a pretty important step in understanding how advanced people are on this issue in unlikely states if voters vote for it.”